0.00/0.00	NO
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Succeeded in reading "/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.trs".
0.00/0.00	    (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED)
0.00/0.00	    (VAR y x)
0.00/0.00	    (RULES
0.00/0.00	      f(c(x),c(c(y))) -> a(a(x)) | c(f(x,y)) == c(a(b))
0.00/0.00	      f(c(c(c(x))),y) -> a(y) | c(f(c(x),c(c(y)))) == c(a(a(b)))
0.00/0.00	      a(x) -> b
0.00/0.00	      a(x) -> f(x,x)
0.00/0.00	    )
0.00/0.00	    (COMMENT Example 2 in extended version of [92])
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	No "->="-rules.
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Decomposed conditions if possible.
0.00/0.00	    (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED)
0.00/0.00	    (VAR y x)
0.00/0.00	    (RULES
0.00/0.00	      f(c(x),c(c(y))) -> a(a(x)) | f(x,y) == a(b)
0.00/0.00	      f(c(c(c(x))),y) -> a(y) | f(c(x),c(c(y))) == a(a(b))
0.00/0.00	      a(x) -> b
0.00/0.00	      a(x) -> f(x,x)
0.00/0.00	    )
0.00/0.00	    (COMMENT Example 2 in extended version of [92])
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Removed infeasible rules as much as possible.
0.00/0.00	    (VAR y x)
0.00/0.00	    (RULES
0.00/0.00	      a(x) -> b
0.00/0.00	      a(x) -> f(x,x)
0.00/0.00	    )
0.00/0.00	    (COMMENT Example 2 in extended version of [92])
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Try to disprove confluence of the following (C)TRS:
0.00/0.00	    (VAR y x)
0.00/0.00	    (RULES
0.00/0.00	      a(x) -> b
0.00/0.00	      a(x) -> f(x,x)
0.00/0.00	    )
0.00/0.00	    (COMMENT Example 2 in extended version of [92])
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Succeeded in disproving confluence.
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	Disproved via the following (C)TRS:
0.00/0.00	(VAR y x)
0.00/0.00	(RULES
0.00/0.00	  a(x) -> b
0.00/0.00	  a(x) -> f(x,x)
0.00/0.00	)
0.00/0.00	(COMMENT Example 2 in extended version of [92])
0.00/0.00	
0.00/0.00	NO
0.00/0.00	EOF