0.00/0.00 YES 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Succeeded in reading "/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.trs". 0.00/0.00 (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED) 0.00/0.00 (VAR z x y) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 sub(z,0) -> z 0.00/0.00 sub(s(z),s(y)) -> x | sub(z,y) == x 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2012.09.005 [72] p. 73 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 No "->="-rules. 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Decomposed conditions if possible. 0.00/0.00 (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED) 0.00/0.00 (VAR z x y) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 sub(z,0) -> z 0.00/0.00 sub(s(z),s(y)) -> x | sub(z,y) == x 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2012.09.005 [72] p. 73 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Removed infeasible rules as much as possible. 0.00/0.00 (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED) 0.00/0.00 (VAR z x y) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 sub(z,0) -> z 0.00/0.00 sub(s(z),s(y)) -> x | sub(z,y) == x 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2012.09.005 [72] p. 73 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Try to disprove confluence of the following (C)TRS: 0.00/0.00 (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED) 0.00/0.00 (VAR z x y) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 sub(z,0) -> z 0.00/0.00 sub(s(z),s(y)) -> x | sub(z,y) == x 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2012.09.005 [72] p. 73 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Failed either to apply SR and U for normal 1CTRSs to the above CTRS or to prove confluence of any converted TRSs. 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Try to apply SR and U for 3DCTRSs to the above CTRS. 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Succeeded in applying U for 3DCTRSs to the above CTRS. 0.00/0.00 U(R) = 0.00/0.00 (VAR x1 x2 x3) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 sub(x1,0) -> x1 0.00/0.00 sub(s(x1),s(x2)) -> u1(sub(x1,x2),x1,x2) 0.00/0.00 u1(x3,x1,x2) -> x3 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 U for 3DCTRSs is sound for the above CTRS. 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 U(R) is confluent. 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 YES 0.00/0.00 EOF