0.00/0.00 NO 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Succeeded in reading "/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.trs". 0.00/0.00 (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED) 0.00/0.00 (VAR y x) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 g(x) -> k(y) | h(x) == d, h(x) == c(y) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(a) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(b) 0.00/0.00 f(k(a),k(b),x) -> f(x,x,x) 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 8 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 No "->="-rules. 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Decomposed conditions if possible. 0.00/0.00 (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED) 0.00/0.00 (VAR y x) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 g(x) -> k(y) | h(x) == d, h(x) == c(y) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(a) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(b) 0.00/0.00 f(k(a),k(b),x) -> f(x,x,x) 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 8 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Removed infeasible rules as much as possible. 0.00/0.00 (VAR y x) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 f(k(a),k(b),x) -> f(x,x,x) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(a) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(b) 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 8 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Try to disprove confluence of the following (C)TRS: 0.00/0.00 (VAR y x) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 f(k(a),k(b),x) -> f(x,x,x) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(a) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(b) 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 8 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Succeeded in disproving confluence. 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 Disproved via the following (C)TRS: 0.00/0.00 (VAR y x) 0.00/0.00 (RULES 0.00/0.00 f(k(a),k(b),x) -> f(x,x,x) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(a) 0.00/0.00 h(d) -> c(b) 0.00/0.00 ) 0.00/0.00 (COMMENT doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2009.08.001 [73] Example 8 submitted by: Thomas Sternagel and Aart Middeldorp) 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 NO 0.00/0.00 EOF